|
|
#105022 - 02/20/08 04:50 AM
Re: q
[Re: Seph OOC]
|
Nova
Registered: 12/27/06
Posts: 1793
|
Why Seph? Did you have something to hide? You should have never sent that to me in the first place. Nova should have posted her demands publicly for me to respond to. Nova asked me to forward them to you to avoid any further public unpleasantness and because she did not want to speak to you. Also, I volunteered. And I have nothing to hide. You simply lack courtesy and respect, and accordingly, I'm done with you. I have plenty of respect for those who have earned it. So far you had earned mine Seph. I thought maybe you could see things from my point of view. Go back and read Ashnod s compliation if you dare. I dont think it was Ashnods intent but she showed exactly how this thing escalated. I felt like Nova ignored a small majority of us, spoke up. She made a snippy comment. I asked her who made her queen and she took the crown! At that point I was more amused than anything. I called them the stortelling nazis the same way the soup nazi is such in Seinfeld. "No soup for you! One year!" i think thats where things started really getting out of control. Then I jobed with my silly voice and she took it as an afront to her sexuality...WHICH I HAD NO CLUE OF. Alot of people seemed to think so. I have tried to spell it out it wasnt my intention. I have never once taken this thing personaally. Yet I myself have taken SO MUCH SHIT FROM SO MANY OF YOU. People ACTUALLY insulting me personally which I do find very odd considering we dont know each other. WTF?
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#105047 - 02/20/08 11:43 AM
Re: q
[Re: Fortune's Son]
|
Nova
Registered: 09/09/05
Posts: 605
Loc: Heartland, USA
|
Here you have a person with above average intelligence but lacking the corresponding level of maturity to actually interact with people on an adult level. In real life he's probably learned to mask the deficiency. Unfortunately, the faceless nature of the internet robs him of the social cues he needs to pretend to be a functional human being. Yet even with all the insults, attacks on his intellect and insanity. After all the teasing and to him, Overload is still willing to participate. From my experience, THAT is how adults act. Teenagers and children cry about how someone said something that hurt their feelings. Adults shrug their shoulders and say 'What's gotten into him'. Children get others to fight their battles for them, because they do not have the emotional capability to so. Adults look at a disagreement between two people and say to themselves. "They can fight their own battles." Instead, we have 4 or five people attacking one person, because he insulted another person, who is unwilling, or incapable of fighting their own battles. Now this group, who is dog-piling on that one person, has the audacity to call him a passive agressive child? I think there is a lot of psychological projection happening here. I am intevening to say that ALL of you are acting like children. If I could, I'd bend each one of you over my knee and give you a good spanking.
_________________________
Simulated disorder postulates perfect discipline, simulated fear postulates courage; simulated weakness postulates strength. -Sun Tzu
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#105051 - 02/20/08 12:30 PM
Re: q
[Re: Jordan Rossi]
|
Nova
Registered: 05/19/01
Posts: 1957
|
Said person attacked another without provocation, threw a temper tantrum, and attempted to rally everyone to his call.
That is not the act of a mature adult.
You can paint the public reaction in any light you wish, but the fact the remains the attacks were made in a public forum, with responses CALLED for by the one making the attacks. That the community reacted in a contrary matter to what Overload wanted isn't children fighting someone elses battle, but a public response to a public attack. If this was meant to be resolved entirely between 2 people, it should have been in pms. Your responsible adult should not have attacked in public, rallied for support in public, if he didn't want a public response, regardless of the form it took.
Lets also not forget that said responsible adult had allies, initially, which negates your argument
_________________________
It is not our fault if you are terrified of what we represent. We make no apologies for what we are.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#105056 - 02/20/08 02:30 PM
Re: q
[Re: Ashnod]
|
Nova
Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 2659
Loc: Texas
|
Overload wrote: Why Seph? Did you have something to hide? You should have never sent that to me in the first place. Nova should have posted her demands publicly for me to respond to. Nova posted almost excatly the same wording yesterday and the other person invovled apologized and all is now right between them and Nova. Overload, you know we are friends, but you did start this and you escalated it when you could have easily defused the situation with a little patience. Second, what you are forgetting or not understanding is that TEXT does not carry tone of voice. While your words may not have been intended as they came across, they did come across as hurtful and mean-spirited. Soup-Nazi is funny because it's in a visual/auditory form where the humor comes across. Text minus smilies or explainations does not carry humor, it can only be interpreted as literal from the wording, and the wording was inflamatory. In the Democracy In Action topic I wrote: This entire 'Democracy in Action! topic has been completely unproductive. It is time to move on. If anyone has preferences on how they would like to change Nova's proposal please feel free to make them in the 'bible' thread where they were intended to be. I expect any such proposals to be completely devoid of personal attacks an snide comments. Any posts in that thread not aimed at getting this game running, but instead to draw people into a fight will result in a vote being called, a vote to label that person a dick and kick them. See rule #1. We've now waisted another half day on pointing fingers and name calling. I'm tired of it. Overload, I pointed out in the PM to you where I stand. We're still friends and I hope you can create a new ID and join in under an assumed name, but I don't think at this point that you can participate in this forum as Overload. You've gotten just about everyone but White Rat calling for your ousting. If you hadn't earned Seph's ire things might have been ok and recoverable, but at this point you have 2 of the three mods pissed at you and the third annoyed that the discussion has been brought to a stand still for three days over a flamewar. This is Nova's baby and she doesn't want you to participate. Seph is very irked with you for your breach of ettiquette. Unless you can come to terms with them, I think it is time for you to bow out and move on. You know that we are friends so I don't say this lightly.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
|