|
|
#109679 - 04/08/08 12:04 PM
Re: 30 days have nearly come and gone
[Re: Mr Fox]
|
Nova
Registered: 04/14/07
Loc: Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Eart...
|
I suppose I should have expected some people to get upset about Body Modification: Special Effect.
Yes, it gives you an aberration - or several aberrations, or more specifically a special effect - for no taint and no penalty. Or specifically, any penalties or bonuses aren't codified by the system and can vary from person to person. It also grants no extra points, so numberically there's no problems whatsoever. It's 'free' in both senses. If you still want aberrations and associated price breaks, the taint system's right over there.
The taint system is also a heavily codified system that subdivides aberrations into minor, medium and major along somewhat arbitrary lines, codifies social penalties that are universally applicable except when they aren't, allows very little wiggle room and most seriously, if you want an aberration you have to pick it off this list if we're going strictly 'by the book,' or submit it for approval.
You could spend time working out what, say, an aberration such as "looks like a fox-woman" or "blinks like a light bulb" is worth, and if it's anything other than minor you can spend time figuring out what other aberrations you HAVE to take, then submit the new aberration for approval and hope that your reasoning doesn't conflict with someone else's, then be unsure who's freaked out by you and who isn't (the APG states in brief that novas with less taint are freaked out by novas with more taint, which seems to conflict with the main book) and never increase a taint-linked trait for fear that suddenly the asthetics of your character will be ruined should he or she sprout nipple-tentacles...
Or, you could skip all that, take Body Modificaton: Special Effect, and leap right into the fun part which is the interaction and writing part.
It's an expedient, simple system, and I'm not going to apologize for 'making a mockery of aberrations' with it. If people are selecting this option over a system that makes their characters more powerful, I say more power to them.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#109698 - 04/08/08 01:18 PM
Re: 30 days have nearly come and gone
[Re: Revenant]
|
Nova
Registered: 04/14/07
Loc: Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Eart...
|
Careful - invoking Nightcrawler might cause Craig to remark that this isn't a superhero game.
A more apt comparison might be someone who's got a scar, or is missing an eye, or due to a skin condition they look kind of orange. It does startle you at first but if life's taught me anything it's taught me that people can and will adapt. I figure that people in Aberrant have a heightened tolerance for weird stuff since they see it on the news.
As for 200X proper I think it's doing well. The mods are approachable in ways that they couldn't be in 2010, the system is cleaner and doesn't get in the way of the stories as much, and there's a very nice charm in being able to start over with characters we enjoy writing about but who were made back when we were lesser writers and have accumulated their share of mistakes.
I only really forsee one problem: that the enthusiasm might wear off. You can't really argue someone into becoming enthusiastic - you have to engage them emotionally, not logically. There's no way to foretell whether or not people will want to stick with 200X, although personally I'm more enthusiastic about it than I ever was about 2010. What we can do is try and figure out why people lose enthusiasm and take the steps that we can to curb that.
Personally, whenever this place devolves into a thin-skinned high-pitched screaming match with everyone sulking and muttering to themselves afterwards, my enthusiasm vaporizes. My enthusiasm might also take a hit once the Slider-Proteus-Aberrants metaplot's up and running, since I've run through it about a dozen times and thirteen's not my lucky number. However, I'm not going to leave the board over it, I'll just try to gently steer around it and hope it doesn't become too obnoxious.
Other than that, 200X is great. There's no way to predict how the future social dynamics are going to shake out, but I think if we treat what we have in common - a desire to have fun writing Aberrant stories - as more important than what we differ on, we'll do fine.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#109701 - 04/08/08 01:34 PM
Re: 30 days have nearly come and gone
[Re: Michael McGee]
|
Nova
Registered: 09/23/05
Loc: Podunk, Hickville
|
RE: Nightcrawler And exactly how many non-nova friends does he have? Several. My enthusiasm might also take a hit once the Slider-Proteus-Aberrants metaplot's up and running, since I've run through it about a dozen times and thirteen's not my lucky number. WW meta-plots are stupid and poorly thought out. I hate them, always have and always will. I've never used a single one of them here at home and tend to ignore them when they arise around here. When Slider gets plugged it'll be no more news worthy than a kid robbing a McDonalds IMO. We all agree that the meta plot is laughable at best, the way we've always stuck so vehemently to the canon story had always left me confused.
_________________________
Shadow is not the absence of light, but the presence of darkness.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#109722 - 04/08/08 04:00 PM
Re: 30 days have nearly come and gone
[Re: Revenant]
|
Nova
Registered: 12/27/06
|
I think some people might be taking the system a bit far, (looking at you unicorn boy) I'm with Fox, some things should just be viewed as Taint. Like anything thought the Body Mod trick has it's ways of being abused. It's the mods responsibility to police that. I think it's a creative way to add odd appearances to a nova without them being freakishly ugly. Nightcralwer is a good example his appearance is startling to those who first meet him, but there isn't a single 'friend' who suffers a social penalty when dealing him. He an okay guy, just odd looking. Nightcrawler would have medium taint: eyes, furry skin and "twisted limbs" being his 3 digit hands and feet. He does invoke fear from "baseline" normals and IIRC, the APG says that social penalties from taint are removed once someone takes the time to befriend such a Nova. As for the Slider scandal, at least Pandora is a member of Utopia so the boards will probably hear about it that way...
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#109757 - 04/08/08 07:45 PM
Re: 30 days have nearly come and gone
[Re: SkyLion]
|
Baseline
Registered: 03/03/08
|
I guess what I'm saying is why do you need to do a reboot for 2010. What is it that 200x has, other than to make a mockery of aberrations, that 2010 doesn't? I'm sorry, but this kind of thing annoys me. This question is (by all appearances at least) deliberately off-topic, deliberately antagonistic, completely unhelpful, and (most importantly) completely untrue. I don't know why everyone else felt the need to chime in with posts defending 200X from Ziggurat's accusation, but I see no need for it. If you (Ziggurat) can: A) explain what possible relevance your question had to Seph's post, and: B) point to some overwhelming trend within the 200X forum to "make a mockery of aberrations" then I'll take your question seriously. Until then I'm simply going to point out that it's annoying and distracting. Back on topic: Re: Seph's proposal: I still don't really see a good reason to disallow 2010 characters from joining the 200X boards, and I don't personally have any problems with the idea myself. Re: Flicker's initial observations: those are some very impressive numbers, and I know I've really enjoyed myself here during the past month, and from the looks of things it seems like most everyone else has too. Re: The Meta-Plot Problem: I'm new and I wasn't around to see how things were handled on the previous boards, so perhaps I'm just naive about this, but I don't really see this as a problem. The Slider Scandal is just a big news piece that'll give us all some reason to gossip ICly amongst ourselves for a few days. Where's the problem in that? As for the Proteus thing, I'm pretty sure that we all agreed that any stories dealing directly with major Meta-Plot threads would need to be reviewed by pretty much everyone and would have to involve carefully plotted out storylines with several different co-authors, etc, etc. I don't see any of this becoming a problem unless someone specifically makes it a problem. So let's all just chillax for a minute and get back to writing good stories, ok? 
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#109760 - 04/08/08 09:01 PM
Re: 30 days have nearly come and gone
[Re: Michael McGee]
|
Nova
Registered: 02/28/08
|
Careful - invoking Nightcrawler might cause Craig to remark that this isn't a superhero game.
One it fucking well isn't. Face facts and deal with it. Two, Marvel doesn't have the TAINT MECHANIC that is present in Aberrant that says ABERRATIONS BRING FUCKERY when it comes to taint and being a nova. Night-fucking-Crawler doesn't have taint. He has a "mutant gene". And yeah, in my non-mod opinion the "body mod" is being abused like a motherfucker. But I ain't a mod.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#109761 - 04/08/08 09:02 PM
Re: 30 days have nearly come and gone
[Re: Aušrinė]
|
Baseline
Registered: 03/08/08
Loc: New York, New York
|
Adressing the mockery point for those who dwell in the realm of subjectivism, lets start with the definition of Aberrant:
First the Adjective,
Function: adjective Etymology: Latin aberrant-, aberrans, present participle of aberrare to go astray, from ab- + errare to wander, err Date: circa 1780 1 : straying from the right or normal way 2 : deviating from the usual or natural type : atypical
now the Noun
aberrant Function: noun Date: 1938 1 : an aberrant group, individual, or structure 2 : a person whose behavior departs substantially from the standard
So in other words, someone with pink hair is BY DEFINITION an aberrant. Not to mention someone who flickers constantly or looks like a unicorn.
As much as many of you wish to deny it; but someone with pink hair will elucidate a negative reaction. So to have something that deviates from the norm without a similar negative reaction, is to deny the very word aberrant.
You guys want to have aberrations without the subsequent penalites..hence the word mockery.
_________________________
If a man take no thought about what is distant, he will find sorrow near at hand. -Confucious
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#109765 - 04/08/08 09:09 PM
Re: 30 days have nearly come and gone
[Re: Dr. Robert White]
|
Baseline
Registered: 04/02/08
|
I'd like to argue that by now, many people will be used to somebody with pink hair or who perpetually glows. They will still draw attention, but otherwise... Well, I'd call it negative if COMA's on your butt trying to kill you or something.
I prefer Taint to be more harmful or out-there effects; Anima Banner, Glow, Hair/Eye Colour and some versions of Aberrant Eyes aren't weird enough for me, so I like the Body Mod: Special Effect.
I also think we'll disagree over this, so let's not go there.
_________________________
Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never ends.
~Corinthians 13:7-8
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#109775 - 04/08/08 09:50 PM
Re: 30 days have nearly come and gone
[Re: Kyria Thea]
|
Nova
Registered: 02/18/08
|
Adressing the mockery point for those who dwell in the realm of subjectivism, lets start with the definition of Aberrant:
First the Adjective,
Function: adjective Etymology: Latin aberrant-, aberrans, present participle of aberrare to go astray, from ab- + errare to wander, err Date: circa 1780 1 : straying from the right or normal way 2 : deviating from the usual or natural type : atypical
now the Noun
aberrant Function: noun Date: 1938 1 : an aberrant group, individual, or structure 2 : a person whose behavior departs substantially from the standard
So in other words, someone with pink hair is BY DEFINITION an aberrant. Not to mention someone who flickers constantly or looks like a unicorn.
As much as many of you wish to deny it; but someone with pink hair will elucidate a negative reaction. So to have something that deviates from the norm without a similar negative reaction, is to deny the very word aberrant.
You guys want to have aberrations without the subsequent penalites..hence the word mockery. Addressing my problem with the poster for those who've dwelled under a rock for the last twenty years or are otherwise new to the Intertubes, let's start with the definition of a Troll: Fuction: Noun 1. Fuck it, I lost patience. You know what I'm driving at. Special Effect is a special fucking effect. No penalties, no reduced cost on anything. The dictionary is not our rulebook, so I politely demand that you:  I've lived in San Fran..the place is full of aberrant people. See above.
_________________________
If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too. ~W. Somerset Maugham
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
|