|
|
#90561 - 06/01/07 02:26 PM
Re: Table Talk
[Re: Ziggurat]
|
Nova
Registered: 09/27/06
Loc: Everywhere
|
Besides, the US used its considerable oil wealth to build its economy as well. Every country that has used oil to it's benefit has been a functioning democracy before it was found. Countries that have used oil to become a functioning democracy (as far as I can tell) total a big round zero. Even if we want to assume Omar is physically around to keep the Kurds on the straight and narrow (this is a job more for Geisha), there's still the rest of the gulf to worry about. To give you an idea of how hard it is for governments to do this right, Canada misused their oil to the point that 20 years after the fact the locals still haven't forgiven the federal government. Basically the one oil rich provence was forced to sell it's oil to the rest of Canada at below market values. The rest of Canada loved it, that one province was put into a depression.
_________________________
Hauling things through the sky.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#90728 - 06/07/07 04:49 PM
Re: Table Talk
[Re: Mr Fox]
|
Nova
Registered: 09/27/06
Loc: Everywhere
|
FROM : Vajas (Moved here from Timeline Adjustments) <_< >_>
You know, I don't want to be an ass by intruding into here and Mr.Fox is free to erase this post whenever he feels like, but...
Not only are you trying to prevent the raise of Marxism and it's Ilk together with Nationalism and Fascism by simply removing the key players (which of some, you don't know with 100% assurance that they were wholely responsable).
You are also trying to remove the whole of second world war out of history, and simply vanish the 1929 Great Crash. On top of that, you are trying to profit from all of this.
What really has me running up is, why is your historical revisionism stopping on the U.S. and Europe? What with you do without the McArthy Era? What will happen without a Vietnam? What about the middle east? will you decide to buy all the oil pits to yourself? How about all the dictatorships in Africa and South America? Will you be getting rid of Pinochet too? How about the Military Dictators in Argentina? Stop the creation of Drug cartels and 'La Cosa Nostra'? How about the creation of Teocratic dictatorships in the middle east and south asia?
Really, you got the information of the whole world, for the next 100 years basically, and you decide to profit from it and make the U.S. into an even bigger country?
(As I said, Mr.Fox feel free to delete this post at will, I'm just really wondering the why.)
Courier's Response:
RE: Profit Not really. Profit is kind of meaningless with all the other resources that are already at the table. Steve's intentions are to gain enough control over various actors in the system that he can push things around without having to mind-rape people. It'd be nice if Steve, aka Bill Gates, could introduce things without needing to be all dark and mysterious.
RE: The rise of Marxism What I'm trying to do is to let it rise, fail, and then fall apart much quicker than it did. Marxism is going to fail, we already know that. Not because of history, because the system is simply unworkable. If Marxism actually had to answer to it's people for the millions it accidently starves to death, this would have been much more obvious much quicker.
RE: My problems with Marxism My problems with Marxism is that's the system that's going to be dropping nukes on novas in the 21th century, and it's also hands down the most oppressive to novas in the 20th and 21st.
RE: Making the US even bigger. Possible, but only possible. One of the big reasons the US is the world power right now is because the various European powers did so poorly at various times. One of the big reasons the US has to play global cop all the time is because there are no international instituitions which can, and because the US got in the habit during WW2 and the Cold War.
RE: ? Were you going to present alternatives? Feel free to.
_________________________
Hauling things through the sky.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#90836 - 06/11/07 12:49 PM
Re: Table Talk
[Re: Mr Fox]
|
Nova
Registered: 12/27/06
|
Greetings again. I wanted to check in again, and again I do apologize. I have had a tab open to the IC thread where I need to catch up but havent gotten to reading it yet. I am among other things a perfromance artist and had a show this last weekend, and preparation for such takes most of my mental energy. So. today I am devoting the morning to catching up in the various games I am in including this one. I have realized however that I have not been getting the enjoyment out of this game that I would like to. Now, nobody panic. Let me explain. It has nothing to do with any of you, or your characters, or mr. Fox, or the story...all those things are wat jazz me and keep bringing me back here. No, i believe what is the issue is my connection with Cody. Its not that I dont like him as a character...in fact I love him and the idea of him. Its just that I have realized that i am playing him in the wrong game. I brought him into play since Fox said the group needed a telepath. All well and good, but Couriers comment really made it dawn clear to me: Not really. Profit is kind of meaningless with all the other resources that are already at the table. Steve's intentions are to gain enough control over various actors in the system that he can push things around without having to mind-rape people.  So that really reminded me of how *dark* Cody's concept is. Of course i designed him this way on peurpose....but he was originally concieved as an Elite. His powers isolate him socially...he gains no pleasure from telepathic contact and is geared for a violent lifestyle. Noting wrong with this, but as the game has progressed I realize he just isnt as fun to play within the context of an (utterly awesome) time-trek game. I would like to ask about changing characters...I should play someone more suited to such a grand intellectual pursuit. I have an idea or two that i am working on that I think will give me more pleasure interacting in this game. Cody is just such a brooding character in my mind that it doesnt quite feel good within the theme of this game...I need someone a little brighter eyed and bushy tailed (taint excluded!). If this is acceptable, then the question remains what to do with Cody? I dont really like the idea of NPCing him indefinitely if i am still in the game. I dont really want to play two characters in one game. Im not sure he would just leave his best friend Steve (and I apologize for not being more on point with that connection Courier). Killing him off is always possible but never satisfying either. Plus he operates the Crusier (which may not be an issu if we can rework the transporter device). So. Thoughts? Feedback? Please?
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#90847 - 06/11/07 06:09 PM
Re: Table Talk
[Re: Mr Fox]
|
Nova
Registered: 12/27/06
|
ST allowing, lose about 3 points of taint in the Hammersmith experiment.
There's actually cannon support for this from the Trinity equiv of the H-smith event.
Point-wise you'd be spending nova points to replace the ones you bought tainted. Thats actually a very good idea, but kinda misses the point. See as a player, I actually *like* his aberrations and the whole brooding bit. I designed him that way on purpose like I said. I didnt take his aberrations to save points but because I liked the theme they established. Changing him is an option and I will consider it but I think Id enjoy Cody much more in a darker nova vs. nova context. One option is that the Hammersmith event did some really freaky things according to the cannon materials. No reason it couldn't have changed Cody in some way, or even 'exchanged' him with an alternate Cody. Or even exchanged him with someone else altogether. Well, I was going to write a little piece about how when Hammersmiths machine started draining quantum that Codys node reacted by pulling back, and he ends up with a ranged q-leech. i like the idea and it fits but again thats yet another anti-nova elite thing to do. I need to think on it, probably sleep on it, reread Codys posts and look over his sheet and see if I really want to alter him. As of right now though I think I can come up with something fresh that will be a better (for me) fit in this setting. Weve been playing long enough now that I have a better feel for the style of game it is, whereas when I picked Cody I didnt really know what was happening. The question still remains as to what to do with Cody if I bring in someone new.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#90873 - 06/12/07 08:40 AM
Re: Table Talk
[Re: SkyLion]
|
Nova
Registered: 09/27/06
Loc: Everywhere
|
On one hand I see what a pivotal role he could be in changing this timeline. On the other...well its still mind raping people. (As Courier so eloquently put it.) Not to Cody I wouldn't.  And it seems to me that this is what the character is built to do. I don't understand the ethical concerns, or why doing it as an elite or part of Project Pro would be better than reprogramming Stalin and Mao. For that matter, basically what the characters are doing is rebuilding Project Pro. We are going to have to kill people. We are going to have to mind rape people. We are going to have to manipulate people. We are going to fund things we like and un-fund things we don't. We are going to withhold information and strike from the shadows. We're going to be using their methods, etc. And we're going to do this for the best of reasons, and people who find out about us after the fact will marvel at our lack of ethics and responsibility. This IS what and why project pro was founded, and what and why the people in it did the things they did (minus Thetis).
_________________________
Hauling things through the sky.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#90878 - 06/12/07 12:07 PM
Re: Table Talk
[Re: Courier]
|
Nova
Registered: 08/03/04
Loc: Texas
|
And we're going to do this for the best of reasons, and people who find out about us after the fact will marvel at our lack of ethics and responsibility. This IS what and why project pro was founded, and what and why the people in it did the things they did (minus Thetis). hehehe... Nicely put. You know, at the moment you guys are kinda operating in a vacuum with no opposition. However, the longer you guys stay in this timeline the more that is going to change. At the very least you guys are eventually going to have to deal with Divis Mal and his cronies. He's just too meglomaniacial to sit back and let you guys have all the fun even if you are building the very world that he would want built. Also, the longer it goes the more other novas that will arise and eventually you guys are going to have a world all ready for novas and full of them. Hopefully it will be going in the right direction, but some of those novas are going to bite the hand that feeds them so to speak. And some will look back at what you've done and not like your methods and challenge you on that basis. Etc, etc. I can't promise that this is going to turn into a more combat oriented game, it likely won't but there will be more nova challenges to face down the longer you stay in one timeline regardless of what timeline that is. So far you guys have been jumping timeline to timeline to gather intel and have specifically been trying to avoid possible conflict, but that can't continue given your current circumstances. So if you are really liking Cody the way he is, you don't have to completely despair and switch characters if you don't want too. There will be challenges uniquely suited to his specific talents. The longer you stay around any | | | |