|
|
#82511 - 02/23/07 04:55 PM
Re: Okay.. A big thing..
[Re: Y.T.]
|
Nova
Registered: 01/08/07
Posts: 730
|
I am not writing what the NPC['s] do or what they are like. I am giving [a] brief note one the world. Note how I did not say a damned thing what this other nova is like other than they work for the US government, and in this case would be opssing [opposing] Utopia's action. That leave many and I do add many levels of gray for other to fill. Oh my. [That leaves room for others to fill in as they will.]
Except for the tiny problem that everyone has, in general, been opposed to the idea of a powerful NPC showing up just to waive dick/clitoris around and make PU back down. If we're going to do this, let's at least have a PC or a group of PCs doing it. I had an image when I typed that, of PCs standing shoulder-to-shoulder in the pouring rain, arms crossed, saying, "This is our country. Thanks for what you've done, but we've got it now." Isn't that much more powerful and evocative than what you have in mind? Name three players who were killed by other players in 2017.
Name one that was killed by another player that was not some sort of heroic battle of epic scales. I can only assume that this is your answer to my request for canon violations in 2017. You are making the claim; the burden of proof is on you. You need to convince me (and anyone else reading) that canon violations have occurred. Frankly though, I'd drop this if I were you. The Directors are supposed to spank canon violators who refuse to acknowledge peer censure; you're stating that they're not doing their job. And if you do have a valid canon violation that has been wrongfully allowed to persist, you need to take it to them for resolution. Jager powers down because if he doesn't he is not aloud allowed in the game.[space] It is the whole if thing of play by my rules or go home. See it is the whole cross over flaw. Like in comic books, it doesn't matter what the canon is for any one character in the story[;] it is about what the fans want. Take Wolverine VS Lobo. Lobo is stronger than sSuperman, and sSuperman has in canon times bent the bullshitium that is wWolverine['s] bones. To sSuperman it is not that big of a deal. Yet in that cross over Lobo did not win the fight, it was a tie. Why? Well because that is what fans boys want. You power down Jager because you do not want him to out shine other people in a story, that is all good, but understand that is just there for the fan boys. But that is not the point. I understand no such thing, because we are not fan boys here. We aren't drooling fans whose only emotional attachment to these characters is the fact that we think they're cool. No, we actually own these characters in a way, and for you to dismiss us as fanboys is insulting. What is the point is that we all share this world. It is not your world; it is not mine. We have to work together to make something happen. You'll note, I've never completely dismissed your idea. I have issues with parts of it, but I think the rest is fine. So let's work together on this, instead of fighting about it, ok? I am trying to say that I am not desiding [deciding] how you or anyone else writes a story, only laying out the facts. I honestly can't say how your characters would react to this action [situation]. SO i [So I] set forth a plot that is based around NPCs who are for this one case acting this way. You the player can choose how to react to this. The only NPCs I am laying any claim to is Carlos and his actions, the rest are well up to anyone else. You DO NOT get what we're saying. Don't base a plot on the NP-frackin-Cs! Base it on the PCs! I don't know how else to say it; I've said it clearly several different ways, and at this point, I think you're just stubbornly digging your heels in, as you have done in the past. Storytime. When I ran my first WoD game (and PW will back me on this), I had no clue what I was doing. I went in with a rich story, great background, an epic plot and three-dimensional NPCs. The PCs had fun for the most part, but one of them finally said, "You know, there are a lot of times where the NPCs are talking, and we players are just sitting here listening to them. That's not fun for us." And I was shattered, because I thought I was hot stuff. This isn't theatre; we're not here to put on a song and dance for the other players. We're here to tell interactive stories, to let each other tell all our stories together, and to generally have fun. Watching an NPC perform the climatic act of the earthquake - because the entire reason you want to do this crisis is to hand PU its hat - is dull and useless. I'm going to ask you to take a step back and divorce yourself from the emotional ties you've invested into this plot and this fight. Consider what I've said, and let's see what we can arrange.
_________________________
"Perfect courage means doing unwitnessed what we would be capable of with the world looking on." --La Rochefoucauld
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#82516 - 02/23/07 05:54 PM
Re: Okay.. A big thing..
[Re: Catalyst]
|
Nova
Registered: 01/08/07
Posts: 730
|
Look, here is the simplest and easiest way to say this the, this: by the time of this story, Catalyst's mentor is going to be rank 4, as premotions promotions and laws being written and such.
That being said, he would be the highest ranking person in nova afairs in the area. His word would be surmountable to the law in this afair affair. The other novas working for the US would be following orders from him or would have to well deal with the shit when it hits the fan. Ok, let me see if I have this right. Your mentor, and the only NPC you want to have control over, would be the one in charge of the situation. Any nova that wanted to help would have to obey his orders, including PU and any independants? And that the penalties for not following him would be legal repercussions, probably dealt with after the crisis is done? But the death thing was about the problem of having no NPC agtaganists antagonists. Wrong. I use NPCs as antagonists all the time, and primarily non-canon NPCs. I prefer them over PC antagonists, actually, because I can do whatever I wish to them. While I really enjoyed my beatdown with the Morrigan and WR, it was a ton of work. Compared to the fight scene with Dragon-Saori, which was just me working alone, it was a lot of effort. Also, I can control the whole thing, and no one cares if I kill them.
_________________________
"Perfect courage means doing unwitnessed what we would be capable of with the world looking on." --La Rochefoucauld
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#82525 - 02/23/07 10:38 PM
Re: Okay.. A big thing..
[Re: Y.T.]
|
Nova
Registered: 09/27/06
Posts: 3005
Loc: Everywhere
|
The only NPCs I am laying any claim to is Carlos and his actions, the rest are well up to anyone else. Fine. And just to double check, while Carlos may be legally powerful, he is NOT a Q6 monster, or 75+ nova point monster?
_________________________
Hauling things through the sky.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#82545 - 02/24/07 05:51 PM
Re: Okay.. A big thing..
[Re: Y.T.]
|
Nova
Registered: 09/27/06
Posts: 3005
Loc: Everywhere
|
So, you want NPCs when you want them...How you want them. Something like that. Mentor 4 can reasonably buy the Governor (Govenator?) of California. That gives legal authority in spades. Pax is an NPC designed to run roughshod over PCs. He’s got the physical and legal ability to ram pretty much anything down anyone’s throat. He does not, can not, show up in this type of environment where everything is run by the PCs. As originally introduced, and granted, it might indeed have been an error of perception on my part, Carlos was going to be Pax-light, also built with both the physical and legal authority to ram things down PCs’ throats. This as a concept isn’t a good thing.
_________________________
Hauling things through the sky.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#82735 - 02/27/07 02:20 PM
Re: Okay.. A big thing..
[Re: Seph OOC]
|
Nova
Registered: 01/08/07
Posts: 730
|
That was not Carlos, that was more of a NPc that Carlos was going to have on call..Not that same NPCs. Would that NPC still be "Pax-light, also built with both the physical and legal authority to ram things down PCs’ throats? (thanks for the nice quote, Dr. T.)" Just wanted to point something out. In the Directive book, in the introductory articles regarding how the Directive was formed, it says explicitly that the US government recruited novas for its own national insterests. I'm unsure at the moment as to whether it ever said there was an actual "team", but it states baldly that there were several nova recruits culled from various arms of the military and the private sector. I'll have to look into this. This may be the source of the "US Nova Team" Dreamer and I were arguing about several months ago. However, there is a difference between acknowledging that the US gov't has NPC novas working for it (something that I've never disagreed with, in principle) and having a 'US Team' of novas (which I'd never heard of in Aberrant).
_________________________
"Perfect courage means doing unwitnessed what we would be capable of with the world looking on." --La Rochefoucauld
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#82740 - 02/27/07 03:03 PM
Re: Okay.. A big thing..
[Re: Y.T.]
|
Nova
Registered: 01/08/07
Posts: 730
|
I apologize for the double post; I found YT's post after my above post. So, you want NPCs when you want them...How you want them. I set up a setting where there was antagonists to many sides. The US side being not only anti-Utopia but interested in gaining a tighter grip on power of novas. Utopia not only is interested in helping others but also in stretching it power over first world nations. No one is arguing against what you are proposing, just how you're proposing it come about. Earthquakes are interesting things in that most damage done during them is damage that is either not repairable or not in need of super fast fixes. Most people who die in first world areas due to earthquakes die rather fast.Like mintues.Damage to buildings get repaired well on the time table of what they want to. In 1989 Santa Cruz was hit by an earthqauke, and there are still places where you can see the damage. In California, the buildings are built to withstand earthquakes. Fewer people die than normal. For example, 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake was a 6.9 and caused 70 deaths. By comparison, on 12/26/03, a 6.6 in Iran killed 31,000.(1) Of course, there are other factors that influence these numbers, but the lower fatality rate for the 1989 quake strongly reflects California's quake technology. So this whole thing about waiting to settle political issues is some what funny to me. The damage is done and is unlikely to get any worse. There is time to talk..Unless you think that repairing phone lines is something more important than having super power vigilantism. And I disagree. You're greatly downplaying the impact that a major quake, centered on a major US city will have. There will be, at worst, buildings collapsing, fires burning, widespread looting and rioting and a fatality rate in the hundreds. Even in CA with all their preparedness and tech, if the "Big One" comes, then it will be a disaster. In the heart of a disaster, things are usually crazy for a short time, then they get better, more organized. That's what I'm talking about when I mention the 3-4 days before the US boots PU. They literally have better things to do than get immediately political. And that's entirely aside from the NPC issue. Which, from the posts above, you still think we need. I'd rather the PCs do it, personally. --------------------- 1. Largest and Deadliest Earthquakes by Year, U.S. Geological Survey, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/world/byyear.php
_________________________
"Perfect courage means doing unwitnessed what we would be capable of with the world looking on." --La Rochefoucauld
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#82744 - 02/27/07 03:31 PM
Re: Okay.. A big thing..
[Re: Dawn, OOC]
|
Nova
Registered: 11/23/06
Posts: 588
|
Whenever possible, ALL international aid organizations contact the central authority, asking if they can help out. They don't just show up. That is very much illegal. What the central authority does is waive visa requirements and the like so the aid agency can move in with all alacrity. Worse case, there is some bureaucrat/politico whose ass is on the line here. They don't want to say "no" when voters and future voters are at stake. In the best case, there is genuine concern about getting the most help to the people who need it.
So, either the US says "yes" and then there is no grounds for the stand-off, or the US says "no" and Utopia doesn't show up. Now, the Utopians could call the governor of Cali and get his/her permission, expecting the governor to clear it with the Federal Government. In that case, the Federal novas are jumping the gun and are in the wrong when they have their confrontation with the Utopians. Expect the sitting President to lose heavily in California during the next election.
_________________________
We are more than what we hold, or what we own. We are what we think and dream too. Don't be a slave to either, but a partner to both.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#82756 - 02/27/07 05:25 PM
Re: Okay.. A big thing..
[Re: Ravenshire]
|
Nova
Registered: 01/08/07
Posts: 730
|
Whenever possible, ALL international aid organizations contact the central authority, asking if they can help out. They don't just show up. That is very much illegal. What the central authority does is waive visa requirements and the like so the aid agency can move in with all alacrity. Worse case, there is some bureaucrat/politico whose ass is on the line here. They don't want to say "no" when voters and future voters are at stake. In the best case, there is genuine concern about getting the most help to the people who need it.
So, either the US says "yes" and then there is no grounds for the stand-off, or the US says "no" and Utopia doesn't show up. Now, the Utopians could call the governor of Cali and get his/her permission, expecting the governor to clear it with the Federal Government. In that case, the Federal novas are jumping the gun and are in the wrong when they have their confrontation with the Utopians. Expect the sitting President to lose heavily in California during the next election. Good points. I hadn't considered this angle. So the story, as it's been plotted thus far, isn't very realistic. What about my idea; the US takes the support for a few days for appearance's sake, then asks PU to leave, setting up the confrontation?
_________________________
"Perfect courage means doing unwitnessed what we would be capable of with the world looking on." --La Rochefoucauld
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#82769 - 02/27/07 06:57 PM
Re: Okay.. A big thing..
[Re: Y.T.]
|
Baseline
Registered: 02/24/07
Posts: 16
|
Utopia overthrew a sovereign nation state...I really don't think they are much of the asking type. They overthrew a sovereign nation that was not a member of and was sanctioned by the UN under the UN's orders. This is very much different from disrespecting US laws, when the US is a permanent member of the UN security council. Apart from anything else, PU is not stupid. Now, because my intention is not to shoot down the whole idea, the US could give PU permission to assist and then attempt to assert a stringent and limiting authority over Project operatives, thus starting a sort of political staring contest and sparking tensions between US and PU field operatives. However, neither of the two factions would make any deliberate "show of quantum force" by fielding powerful novas and, I believe, would pointedly avoid it. I mean, having Pax and a US uber-nova frowning and circling each other would be the political equivalent of waving nuclear warheads in your rival's face and the social equivalent of the local police getting in a shootout with the federal police. Not realistic at all. I suggest the event continue, and the focus being on characters wanting to help and being both frustrated and confused by the stringency of US bureaucracy enforced to keep both PU and independent novas from exerting much of their power and influence.
_________________________
That which does not kill me makes me stronger
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#84166 - 03/14/07 06:08 PM
Re: Okay.. A big thing..
[Re: BlackThorn]
|
Nova
Registered: 11/25/06
Posts: 323
Loc: Oregon, U.S.A.
|
7.1 Ritcher Scale Earthquake that lasts almost a minute? Might just split California away from the continent and create a volcano, a pretty damn tall one. It's just THAT massive.
On the other hand, as an example on September 19 of 1985 an 8.1 Earthquake hit Mexico city for about 15 seconds at max, and the shaking continues for over 4 minutes, it totaled 500+ buildings and upwards of 30,000 were killed.
Mexico city is not a city that gets big earthquakes a lot, the buildings were not ready for it and that's part of the reason the desctrution toll was so high.
---------------
That said, I would say that L.A. has specific zoning laws to prevent Earthquake damage, to this I would say a 7.1 Earthquake for 20-25 seconds should be enough to cause structural damage, split water, electrical and gas pipes and to maybe crack the concrete of some streets.
On top that, you are forgetting about the Aftershocks. Quakes never come alone, they come in pairs and sometimes triplets so while a single 7.0 Earthquake can't do as much damage, how about a a 7.0 followed bya a 6.5 followed by a 6.0?
The other two just hit the battered buildings over to finish the job really.
An Earthquake dosen't have to be huge to be deadly, just have an earthquake that hits things like hospitals, fire departments and schools as hard as you want, the city becomes paralized...
What do you guys think about that?
Edited by Robert J. Lambert (03/14/07 06:18 PM) Edit Reason: Getting more accurate information
_________________________
Robert J. Lambert, Business and Economics Student. Oct 25, 2008. In Memory of Robert Lambert Sr. and Laura Lambert. I will never forget you.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
#84167 - 03/14/07 06:14 PM
Re: Okay.. A big thing..
[Re: BlackThorn]
|
Nova
Registered: 11/22/06
Posts: 574
|
Well, let's change the time then. I was working with bad data.
Ten of the fifteen largest earthquakes in the United States have occurred in Alaska, and eight of the fifteen largest in the continental United States have occurred in | | | |